The Persian Gulf War of 1991 set a high standard for airpower. It began with a 38-day air campaign that destroyed Iraq's command and control system, closed down the bridges and supply routes, and put the world's sixth largest air force out of business for the duration of the war.
Iraqi tanks moved from their entrenched positions but twice--in the ill-fated lurch toward Khafji and, later, in the desperate retreat from Kuwait--and were shot to pieces by airpower on both occasions.
Before the ground offensive started, the casualties and desertions reduced Iraqi troop strength by at least half. Two-thirds of the armor had been destroyed. In just four days, coalition ground forces rolled over what was left of the world's fourth largest army. US personnel losses were 615 killed and wounded rather than the 20,000 casualties that had been anticipated.
There were memorable feats of precision attack. In the most famous example, a fighter rolled in on the Iraqi Defense Ministry in Baghdad and tucked a bomb neatly down the air shaft. In another instance, F-111Fs hit an oil-pumping manifold from 20 miles away with a precision guided bomb.
The Gulf War standard for airpower has loomed large in the various force alignment exercises of the 1990s--the Bottom-Up Review, the Quadrennial Defense Review, and most recently, the National Defense Panel report--with critics attacking it and defenders defending it in the competition for resources.
What even airpower advocates tend to overlook, though, is that the Gulf War standard is seven years old, says Brig. Gen. Charles F. Wald, who becomes USAF director of strategic planning this month. The Air Force today meets a higher standard than it did in 1991.
"You can focus your radar on the same thing the off-board synthetic aperture radar is looking at," Wald says. "The commander has real-time targeting. The intelligence capability at wing level at Aviano Air Base in Italy today is probably 10 times better than [theater commander Gen. H. Norman] Schwarzkopf had in the Gulf War."
It is fashionable once again to disparage airpower. Newspaper analysts tell us that the four-day ground offensive, not the air campaign, was decisive in the Gulf. They do not explain how, before the ground offensive began, the Iraqi force came to be so depleted, demoralized, and unable to conduct coherent military operations.
The General Accounting Office has tried twice to prove that aerial precision attack doesn't amount to much. The Pentagon's main war planning model rates airpower as less effective than its actual performance in the Gulf. When budget reduction candidates are identified, airpower leads the list.
The nation's top defense leaders were right in 1991 when they said airpower was the decisive element in the Gulf War. It is perverse that seven years and many improvements later, airpower is still fighting for respect.
It is not an automatic assumption that airpower will be decisive in every case, but it is the best thing we have going for us. It is difficult to imagine a future conflict of any major scope in which landpower or seapower could survive--much less be decisive--without airpower.
Daily Report: Read the day's top news on the US Air Force, airpower, and national security issues.
Daily Report: Read the day's top news on the US Air Force, air power, and national security issues.
Tweets by @AirForceMag