There are two outstanding and truly significant dates in
aerospace history: December 17, 1903, when the Wright brothers proved
controlled flight was possible in a heavier-than-air machine, and July 20,
1969, when Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin walked on the moon.
Another date between those two should be remembered for its
significance to aerospace progress: September 24, 1929. That was the day Lt.
James H. "Jimmy" Doolittle made the first complete flight from
takeoff to landing solely by the use of instruments and radio.
Up to that time, scheduled air travel had been stymied
because of man's own limitations—susceptibility to vertigo or a false sense of
motion. Humans are unable to fly "blind" in the clouds for any
length of time, although many tried, convinced that they were so gifted they
could fly through any kind of weather "by the seat of their pants."
Their contempt for bad weather led to many deaths as aviation went through its
The inability of pilots to fly in bad weather meant that the
airplane would never be able to compete with ground transportation. Many
thought the problems of blind flight would never be solved.
In the mid-1920s, gyro instruments and more accurate
altimeters were being tested, a few pilots were being trained in instrument
flying, and air navigation using low-frequency radio ranges was being investigated.
An enlightened few thought that if aircraft instruments could be perfected and
married with the burgeoning radio arts of the day, perhaps the mysteries of
aircraft flight in bad weather could be solved.
The Full Flight
One of those progressive thinkers was Daniel Guggenheim,
wealthy industrialist and philanthropist, who established the Fund for the
Promotion of Aeronautics in 1926. To carry out one aspect of Guggenheim's
program, the Full Flight Laboratory was established at Mitchel Field, N. Y.
Jimmy Doolittle was borrowed from the Air Corps to share direction of the Laboratory
with Prof. William G. Brown of MIT.
Many experiments in blind landing under foggy conditions
that had been previously conducted in England and France were studied:
tethered balloons lined up with the landing runway to lead planes in, an
electrified cable system, and the dragging of weights behind planes.
Experiments with sonic and radio altimeters and various fog-dispersal methods
were tried. None of these worked.
The Laboratory purchased two aircraft: a Consolidated NY-2
training plane, noted for its ruggedness, and a Navy Vought Corsair O2U-1 for
cross-country flying. Several kinds of test instruments were installed on the
NY-2, but the Sperry artificial horizon and directional gyroscope proved to be
the right combination for directional control, along with the sensitive
Kollsman altimeter. Doolittle, with Lt. Ben Kelsey along as safety pilot, made
more than a hundred blind flights and landings under the hood.
"To make a landing," Doolittle explains, "the
plane was put into a glide at sixty mph, with some power on, and flown directly
into the ground. The landing gear absorbed the shock, and if the angle of glide
was just right, the airplane didn't even bounce."
During the radio phase of the tests, it was decided that,
while aural nulls (periods of silence) over a station were satisfactory for
rough aerial navigation, a visual indicator in the cockpit would give the pilot
the precise directional control needed during the final phase of blind
landings. A pair of vibrating reeds connected to the radio set worked best.
"If the pilot was to the right of the radio beam, the
left reed vibrated more vigorously and vice versa. If on course, both reeds
vibrated through the same arc. As the plane approached the radio station, the
amplitude of vibration increased. A single reed started to vibrate as the
fan-type marker beacon was approached. It reached maximum amplitude, quickly
dropped to zero when the plane was directly overhead, rapidly built up to
maximum again, and then tapered down as the plane pulled away. The homing range
indicator also had a distinct null in the headset when the plane was directly
over the range station."
Flying Through the Fog
On the morning of September 24, 1929, thick fog engulfed
Mitchel Field, and Doolittle decided to make an actual instrument flight—alone.
The ground radios were manned and the radio beacons turned on. Doolittle taxied
out and took off. "Came through the fog at about 500 feet," he
recalls, "and made a wide swing coming around into landing position. By
the time I landed ten minutes later, the fog had just started to lift."
Doolittle had wanted Guggenheim to witness the flight in
actual weather, but hadn't waited because he was afraid the fog would disperse.
When Guggenheim arrived, Doolittle wanted to make another solo flight under the
hood to prove it could be done, but Guggenheim insisted that Ben Kelsey go
along as safety pilot. Doolittle made the circuit using the instrument landing
procedure he had developed. Kelsey flew with his hands held high in the
slipstream so all could see he was not doing the flying.
"However, despite all my previous practice," says
Doolittle, with an embarrassed grin, "the approach and landing were
sloppy. So far as I know," he adds modestly, disregarding his many hooded
practice flights, "this was the first time an airplane had been taken off,
flown over a set course, and landed by instruments alone."
This landmark flying feat by the "master of the
calculated risk" marked the beginning of a new era for aviation. On
Sunday, September 24, 1989, the sixtieth anniversary of that flight, a
sculpture of Doolittle will be unveiled near the Jimmy Doolittle Hangar at the
former Aircraft Radio Corp.'s airfield at Boonton, N. J., where Doolittle consulted
many times with ARC's experts during the Full Flight Laboratory experiments.
C.V. Glines is a
regular contributor to this magazine. A retired Air Force colonel, he is a free-lance
writer, a magazine editor, and the author of numerous books. His most recent
article for AIR FORCE Magazine was 'Mama Joe's Tablecloth" in the August
Daily Report: Read the days top news on the US Air Force, airpower, and national security issues.
Daily Report: Read the day's top news on the US Air Force, airpower, and national security issues.
Tweets by @AirForceMag