Washington, D. C.—One year ago this month, the Air Force made
its strongest‑ever commitment to space. On December 2, 1988, its leaders
issued a new policy that put space-power on a par with airpower. Starring roles
were envisioned for the Air Force in space and for space in the Air Force.
Now the Air Force has a point man for putting that policy
into practice. He is Martin C. Faga, the first Assistant Secretary of the Air
Force for Space.
Mr. Faga has a tall order: "to ensure that the Air
Force integrates space throughout its structure and to prepare for the
evolution of spacepower from combat support to the full spectrum of military
Thus did Secretary of the Air Force Donald B. Rice define
the purpose of USAF's new space-leadership post in announcing its creation last
October. Dr. Rice called his move "consistent with Air Force policy that
space is intrinsic to the future of the Air Force, and that spacepower will
assume as decisive a role in future combat operations as airpower has
Mr. Faga says 'Amen" to that. He believes that USAF
should lay claim to space as a warfighting arena and develop combat
capabilities to back up that claim.
He asserts, "We need to advance our role in space,
recognizing that there will always be individual space systems that the other services
will be building for themselves. All the services need satellite systems to
conduct unique operations.
"But that's different from having combat capability in
space and being responsible for military activity in space, which is a role
that I expect the Air Force to seek, organize for, and attain.
"We need to be the aerospace service. We need to move
now to accomplish that—not in the sense of grabbing off the role, but by
forming the infrastructure and planning the strategy to build the role."
Air Force space advocates in blue suits and in mufti hailed
the establishment of the space-oriented post in the upper echelons of USAF's
civilian hierarchy. They saw it as evidence that Secretary Rice is picking up
on space where his predecessor, Edward C. "Pete" Aldridge, Jr., left
As Air Force Secretary, Mr. Aldridge consistently championed
space operations. He and Gen. Larry D. Welch, Air Force Chief of Staff, wrote
the new Air Force space policy that went into effect a year ago.
Mr. Faga will call the shots on space within the Air Force
and for the Air Force in such arenas as Capitol Hill, the Defense Department,
and the intelligence community. An electrical engineer, he has long experience
in the technical and techno-policy circles of all those arenas. His feel for
them should serve him well in the battles over space strategies, priorities,
programs, and politics that surely lie ahead.
Mr. Faga seems in good shape to answer the bell. His brief,
as articulated by Secretary Rice, is nothing less than "the overall
supervision of Air Force space and space-related matters, with primary emphasis
on policy, strategy, and planning."
There's more. The Air Force Secretary made it clear that
Mr. Faga is now his "principal advisor on space matters" and his
special agent. He has instructed Mr. Faga to see to it that Air Force space
systems "are responsive to the needs of all operational services,"
and to form "close, cooperative relationships with the Army, the Navy,
and other Department of Defense and non-DoD organizations [such as the
National Aeronautics and Space Administration] with space-related
Mr. Faga does not have carte blanche. There are things he
cannot do, such as horn in on programs that are properly the purview of the Assistant
Secretary of the Air Force for Acquisition, Jack Welch, and of Maj. Gen.
Thomas S. Moorman, Jr., the acquisition shop's Director of Space and Strategic
Defense Initiative (SDI) programs.
Nonetheless, Mr. Faga has leverage in programming and budgeting
by virtue of his mandate to collaborate with Air Force acquisition and
financial executives. He is responsible for forging space budgets acceptable
to all and for ensuring "an internally consistent and balanced space
Mr. Faga also serves on the Air Force Council, a heavyweight organization of top uniformed and civilian leaders that holds sway on all manner of high-priority matters. He enjoys direct access to USAF's uniformed leadership, too, thanks to what may be the most sweeping line in his charter.
It empowers him to "advise the Secretary and the Chief
of Staff on space policies, plans, programs, budgets, and operations,"
which pretty much says it all.
"One of the things I like about having a title that
specifies 'space' is that I can be completely up front about what I'm
doing," Mr. Faga says. "Everybody understands where I'm coming from.
I'm the space guy; I'm here for one thing—to represent space. I'm free to be
its all-out advocate."
He has no illusions that space priorities and programs will
always win or hold their own in competition with others more obviously oriented
to air-power. "It will be interesting, taking part in [Air Force] Council
meetings and other forums where C-17s, B-2s, ATFs, and the like are being discussed.
I'll have to learn, but I'll need to play heavily in those discussions
"There is a lot of education about space that needs to
go on inside the Air Force, and this is perfectly natural. People who have been
flying bombers and fighters sometimes don't know all that much about space.
"But I find that many of them get very interested, even
excited, when they learn what it's all about and what it can do for the Air
Force and for military operations in general. Many senior officers with no
current duties involving space are more and more attentive to space and
recognize that it is now a big part of the Air Force.
"It is important for me to build on that recognition.
I'm not talking about long-term planning for space as just a support service,
with communications and weather and navigation data, for example, coming from
"I'm talking about planning for space control and for
applying military force in space."
Mindful of moves to "demilitarize" space, such as
the opposition to deploying space-based weapons planned in the SDI program and
the congressional ban on further US testing of antisatellite weapons, Mr. Faga
says he expects little or no slackening of the "great resistance to
military capability in space of whatever sort" now evident in political
and popular circles.
"But I believe that military force moves into any arena
where technology permits it to go—in the form of airplanes, submarines, and
now spacecraft," he declares. "That's not to say that I don't also
believe in the arms-limitation process and in the attempts to build strategic
stability through negotiation."
Mr. Faga emphasizes that the US should be capable of doing
battle in space and that the Air Force, as the designated "aerospace
service," should carry out that mission.
He describes the issue of military activity in space as
"politically charged" and predicts that it will engender "a
very difficult national debate, in Congress and in the public, over the next
"It's the right debate to have," Mr. Faga
continues, "and I expect that the going will be difficult for me on the
Hill. Secretary Rice recognizes that putting 'space' behind my title is sure to
Mr. Faga is no Johnny-come-lately to political debate or to
space issues. A Capitol Hill veteran, he joined the staff of the House
Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence more than twelve years ago and has
headed its Program and Budget Authorization Subcommittee staff since 1984.
Among other things, he was responsible for the oversight of "technical
collection" programs by means of classified systems based in space.
He has the advantage of hands-on experience with such
From 1972 to 1977, he was an engineer in the CIA's Office
of Development and Engineering, working on "advanced systems for
intelligence collection by technical means."
Mr. Faga is in no position to comment on those experiences
or on spaceborne intelligence systems that were in play, or being developed,
during his years in the intelligence community. Nor can he comment on reports
that he now represents the Air Force in overseeing the deployments and
operations of such systems, along with counterparts from the intelligence
Sensors and such have been the stuff of Mr. Faga's career. A
native of Bethlehem, Pa., he earned bachelor's and master's degrees in
electrical engineering at Lehigh University. He served in the Air Force in the
1960s as a research and development officer, specializing in infrared and laser
technologies for reconnaissance systems. He worked on seismic and magnetic
sensors at MITRE Corp. before joining the CIA in 1972.
Mr. Faga's congressional experience should prove valuable
at the Pentagon quite apart from the technical, legislative, and political insights
that he gained from it. He earned a reputation on Capitol Hill for good work
and good sense, and he rubbed elbows with more than a few members of Congress
who make a difference.
One was Rep. Richard Cheney of Wyoming, a member of the
House Intelligence Committee, who showed a keen interest in space.
Mr. Cheney became Secretary of Defense last March and was
joined at the Pentagon in May by Dr. Rice, who had headed the RAND Corp. Almost
at once, the two leaders began conferring on space plans and policy. Dr. Rice
made it clear that he intended to strengthen the Air Force's commitment to
His first move in this regard was to reorganize his shop to
sharpen its focus on space. He had inherited a secretariat in which space elements
were scattered. They were being handled, in isolation or duplication, by
several offices, such as those of the Assistant to the Secretary for Space
Policy and the Military Assistant to the Secretary.
With Mr. Cheney's approval, Secretary Rice created the
position of Assistant Secretary for Space and consolidated all space
responsibilities in it. Mr. Cheney then recommended Mr. Faga's appointment to
it, and President Bush followed through.
General Welch was in the picture throughout. He is said to have
encouraged Secretary Rice to create Mr. Faga's post.
"The Chief of Staff has been most supportive," Mr.
Faga declares. "He stands solidly behind the space policy that he and Mr.
Aldridge signed late last year. He approves of this as the way to bring focus
to organizing, training, and equipping the Air Force for space."
Technically, the military departments are restricted to
doing just that—organizing, training, and equipping forces. They are not empowered
to run the combat operations of those forces. That responsibility falls to
the commanders in chief of the unified or specified warfighting commands, such
as US Space Command and US European Command.
Mr. Faga acknowledges this distinction, but sees "no
conflict between the proper role of the Air Force and the purposes of the Air
Force in space." Referring to the CINC of US Space Command, Air Force Gen.
John L. Piotrowski, Mr. Faga says, "most of the capabilities that he needs
as an operational commander have got to be developed here, in the Air Force,
and my job is to build support for that.
"But there will be more and more military activity in
space, and I believe that the Air Force should assert combat capability in
space as an Air Force mission. We need to prepare to be the service that operates
There is increasing evidence that the uniformed Air Force
leadership is bent on doing so. For example, USAF's basic doctrine is being revised
to put more emphasis on projecting airpower around the world from bases in the
United States and to take advantage of space and space systems in the process.
The officer in charge of the doctrine's updating, Maj. Gen.
Charles G. "Chuck" Boyd, USAF's Director of Plans, declares, "We
can't think of the future without thinking about space, about the kinds of
aerospace power that will be required. Most, if not all, of the missions that
we perform in the atmosphere today we will be able to perform from space.
"We should not turn to performing them from space just
to be able to say we can. However, as technologies evolve, and if they make it
possible for us to do our missions more effectively and at less cost from
space, then we must do so, whether those missions be close air support,
interdiction, offensive counterair, defensive counterair, or whatever."
The Air Force/NASA National Aerospace Plane (NASP) program
is seen as the seedbed of those technologies. It is aimed at developing a
family of hypersonic aircraft/spacecraft that could vault into space from
ordinary runways and perform a wide variety of combat missions.
The NASP program has been stretched to cut its costs in the
short term and reduce its technical risks over the long term. Mr. Faga thinks
this makes good sense.
"I talked to Dr. Rice a good bit about NASP before I
came aboard," he says. "We agreed that the Air Force needs to be
working on things that will affect it fifteen or twenty years into the future.
But we also agreed that we don't know now—and don't need to know now—what some
of these technologies will lead to.
"We know we have to be in scram-jets, hypervelocity
vehicles, advanced aerospace materials and structures, and advanced avionics
control systems—all part of NASP. We've pushed those technologies, and we
welcome and need the focus that the NASP program provides for them. But we
shouldn't set specific goals for the program just yet. For example, we don't
know at the moment whether a single-stage-to-orbit machine is going to make any
"We do know that all sorts of new things become
possible as technology evolves, and this will be the case in space. Technology
will offer new capabilities and lead to new requirements there."
Mr. Faga sees tough force-structure decisions awaiting USAF
in future years as space systems and operations continue to increase in importance.
To make the best use of its resources, the Air Force may someday have to
choose between combat space wings and combat air wings, for example, in
deciding how best to deploy both, or either, in applying "aerospace
"I see it coming," Mr. Faga says. "It will
happen long after my time, but it's something we have to start planning for
now. There's a lot of work to be done on the question of the Air Force's role
in space, and on fitting that into the larger question, which is being asked at
the OSD [Office of the Secretary of Defense] level, about the role of the
military in space.
"We need to begin organizing for that. Among other
things, we need to build a more responsive, less expensive infrastructure for
operational space launches, which is one of the major needs that General
This need is the reason that the Air Force has tied a big
blue ribbon on the Advanced Launch System (ALS) program, in which NASA is its
partner. The overarching purpose of the program is to develop next-generation
technologies for a new family of booster rockets. Mr. Faga calls ALS "an
umbrella program for the kind of improvements that we need for quicker
response on launchpads and for much lower costs per launch."
The space-launch demands projected for 501 systems in the
1990s figured heavily in the decision to embark on ALS. Some SDI systems would
need to ride into space atop heavy-lift boosters such as those expected to
emerge from ALS. But the Air Force needs ALS quite apart from its connection
with SDI and would continue to pursue it with might and main should 501 falter.
"Heavy lift may be one reason for ALS, but there are
dozens of others that have nothing to do with heavy lift," Mr. Faga
The SDI program is developing several technologies and
systems that the Air Force covets for future space operations, including
satellites to detect and target enemy ICBMs in air and space. USAF needs
less-complicated variants of such satellites for early-warning and
space-surveillance purposes and is prepared to take over their development if
SDI goes away.
The Air Force would also like to have an antisatellite
weapon for intercepting hostile spacecraft, notably the Soviet radar
satellites that would be used in wartime to target US naval forces. All the
services are developing ASATs of different kinds. Congress is leery of them,
and their future is uncertain.
To the Air Force, though, one thing is sure about ASATs.
USAF will insist on being in charge of their battle management and command
control and communications, no matter which service develops and deploys them.
This bullish approach to ASATs is in accord with USAF's
newfound assertiveness on space and on its role in space, as personified by
Says he: "I believe that we must begin organizing for
operations of military man in space and start looking ahead to when we'll
reach that point. I also believe that almost anything we can imagine in space,
we'll eventually see there, and that we must begin discussing and planning the
time frame in which we'll see it."
Daily Report: Read the day's top news on the US Air Force, airpower, and national security issues.
Tweets by @AirForceMag