AFSOC Gen. William Whittenberger addresses the Third Directed energy Summit in Washington.
US should put more emphasis on directed-energy weapons, including concentrating
on developing a doctrine for their use, said Brig. Gen. William Whittenberger, assistant to the director of strategic plans at Air Force Special Operations on Command.
Speaking Tuesday at the Third Directed Energy Summit, Whittenberger said
that directed-energy military technology is still in the early
stages of development, similar to the period between World War I and World
War II, when such new technologies as airplanes, automatic weapons advances, radios,
and tanks changed warfare. Germany, he said, gained a military edge over
technologically more advanced Britain and France because it developed new doctrine
and tactics that used the new technologies.
“Our entire integrated air defense can be dismantled through
directed-energy efforts,” he told the gathering, including both laser and
“Radar [can be] overloaded, computers and terminals overheated, rendering
command and control centers ineffective, guidance capability on missiles
blinded or burned, satellites overloaded, cell phone towers destroyed, all by
directed-energy systems, those are simple, effective, offensive actions to kick
in the door, all with less risk, increased effectiveness, less cost, less
collateral damage over today’s capabilities,” he said.
The Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense approved its version of the Fiscal 2019 funding bill on Tuesday, which included a total of $317 million in directed energy programs. Of that, $150 million will fund USAF programs focused on airbase air defense, precision attack, and aircraft self-protection.
Whittenberger said the US must “harden against these threats or
become a victim to our own success as these technologies will be pirated by
other peer nations,” which will also make directed-energy weapon advances of
More emphasis also must be placed on doctrine.
Currently, he said, work on military use of directed-energy
technology is being done “from the bottom up.” However, he noted, “We need to flip that to working doctrinally down and making
sure that we have the right requirements in place."
Daily Report: Read the day's top news on the US Air Force, airpower, and national security issues.
Tweets by @AirForceMag