a 23-year seesaw legal battle in which both sides were at some point “up” by
more than a billion dollars, the Navy and its A-12 contractors have put the
A-12 controversy to rest with a settlement.
Jan. 27, 2014: After a 23-year seesaw
legal battle in which both sides were at some point “up” by more than a billion
dollars, the Navy and its A-12 contractors have put the A-12 controversy to
rest with a settlement.
the deal announced by the Justice Department, Boeing will give the Navy three
EA-18G Growler electronic warfare jets and convert some of its Super Hornet
multiyear contracts to fixed-price. General Dynamics will give $200 million
worth of credits on the DDG-1002 guided missile destroyer project. The Navy
pays nothing in return, other than giving up further claims on the project. Air
Force officials were not able to say by press time whether it will receive any
funds due to the fact the service was partnered with the Navy on development of
“We are closing a
23-year-long chapter in the annals of naval aviation and further strengthening,
through the contractors’ in-kind payment, the Navy’s capabilities and
capacities,” Navy Secretary Ray Mabus said. “The litigation was protracted and
difficult, but it saved the Navy billions of dollars.”
its 23 years, the case involved five trials and went
as high as the Supreme Court; three appeals sent the case back to lower
courts or vacated earlier decisions. The deal was struck in July of last year,
but was kept quiet pending Fiscal 2014 authorization from Congress that the
Navy could “keep and retain” settlement funds. Boeing said it would count the
payments as a pre-tax writeoff.
A-12 was a highly secret stealth airplane program started in the mid-1980s
under the Reagan Administration. It was to be a tandem-seat, two-engined strike
aircraft of about 26,000 pounds. Pentagon leaders demanded the aircraft be
developed under a fixed-price contract. The then-separate companies of Northrop
and Grumman, which teamed for the A-12, ultimately opted not to bid because
they believed such a contract was unworkable. The project was awarded to the
team of McDonnell Douglas and General Dynamics, which offered a triangular
flying-wing design, which acquired the unofficial nickname “Dorito.”
technical challenges mounted—operational stealth aircraft technology was still
in its infancy—costs ballooned and the scheduled first flight slipped
by more than two years. Both the Navy and the contractors began keeping two
sets of books on the program; one showing how it was really doing, and a fake
set which each used in discussions with the other. The contractors feared that admitting
huge overruns and schedule slips would put them in costly default; the Navy’s
program leaders feared that acknowledging the mounting problems would vacate
the fixed-price deal and make them liable for the overages.
Navy reported to then-Defense Secretary Dick Cheney that the A-12 was on time
and on budget, a fiction which he repeated to Congress in his Major Aircraft
Review. When the real facts about the A-12 began to leak out through the press
in 1990, Cheney ordered an Inspector General investigation. After reading the
IG report, Cheney ordered the A-12 cancelled in January, 1991, on the eve of
Operation Desert Storm.
legal dispute started soon after.
contractors argued Cheney had no standing to cancel the A-12; their contract
was with the Navy, and when the Navy followed Cheney’s order, the cancellation
became an action for the convenience of the government. That meant they were
entitled to termination costs, in their view. The Navy, argued, of course, that
fault was with the contractors for failing to perform; though eight aircraft
were to be delivered under the $4.8 billion development contract, when the A-12
was terminated, the only physical result was a half-built engineering mockup,
and the Navy wanted the $1.33 billion in progress payments back.
the issue was whether the government was under any obligation to share stealth
technology it had paid for on the B-2 bomber, which may have saved time and
effort on the A-12. Only late in the effort, a month before the termination,
was B-2 data made available.
General Dynamics (formerly Convair) sold its aircraft business to Lockheed
Martin in 1993, it retained its standing in the lawsuit, believing it to be a
moneymaker. When Boeing acquired McDonnell Douglas in 1997, it inherited the
A-12 lawsuit as well.
sides were ordered to put money in escrow against losing a court decision. Boeing
had put aside about $350 million in 1990, which has been collecting interest. A
Boeing spokesman was unable to say what the account is worth now, because
earnings reports come out soon and the company is not permitted to discuss
bottom-line figures until they are formally released. In previous statements on
the case, Boeing has acknowledged that its liability could conceivably have
been as high as $1.75 billion, or its benefit as much as $1.2 billion,
“including interest from June 26, 1991.”
demise of the A-12 played a significant role in shaping today’s tactical combat
fleet in the Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps. When the A-12 failed, the Navy
at first sought to replace it with the A-X (later the A/F-X) program. When
funds and time did not permit replacing the A-6 in a timely manner, the Navy was
compelled to enlarge and enhance the F/A-18C/D into the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet.
A/F-X requirement was folded in with the Air Force’s Multirole Fighter F-16
replacement and the Marine Corps’ Advanced Short Takeoff and Vertical landing
AV-8B replacement. The disparate programs were homogenized into the Joint
Strike Fighter program, now in production as the F-35A, F-35B, and F-35C. The
Air Force never did replace the F-111 with another interdiction/strike
aircraft, but did somewhat boost its inventory of F-15E Strike Eagles to take
on some of the mission.
Daily Report: Read the day's top news on the US Air Force, airpower, and national security issues.
AFA is closed on Monday for the President's Day holiday. The next Daily Report will be Tuesday, Feb. 20.
Tweets by @AirForceMag