The journey of the US military from a force built around
equipment and structures suited to industrial age warfare, to one modeled on
the challenges of the information age is at the core of the problem the
Quadrennial Defense Review is trying to solve, said Maj.
Gen. Steven Kwast, the Air Force’s QDR representative, during a
Mitchell Institute for Airpower Studies event in Arlington, Va., Thursday. Over
the past months, the QDR representatives from each of the services have started
examining the risks in the world, and how the security environment will change
in the coming years. But there are limitations, and Kwast made it clear that fiscal
uncertainty—even with a new budget deal on the way—is taking its toll in those strategy
talks. “The work has been good and collaborative and interesting, but we get to
a point in that conversation where we have uncertainty on the resources,” Kwast
said, referring to the specter of sequestration’s effects. This makes it “very
difficult” to come to a finish line where strategy options are presented
definitively. “If you make the worst case assumption, you’ll probably be wrong
even then,” he added. “Sequestration may not be the worst case scenario in our
Daily Report: The day's top news on the US Air Force, airpower, and national security issues.
Daily Report: Read the day's top news on the US Air Force, airpower, and national security issues.
Tweets by @AirForceMag